A field guide to AI positions

Content changes

This page records material published corrections and explains whether a change reflects new evidence or a revised interpretation. A changed coordinate alone does not establish that someone changed their mind. Read the method.

Current edition: 0.19.0. Evidence cutoff: 2026-09-15.

  1. a16z: personal advocacy does not establish a firm position

    The earlier map placed Andreessen Horowitz from Marc Andreessen’s manifesto, scoped as platform advocacy. The essay’s footer attributes the views to individual personnel and excludes a16z Capital Management and its affiliates. The firm is now unplaced because the reviewed material does not establish both axes at firm level. Marc Andreessen’s personal record remains separate.

    The Techno-Optimist Manifesto

    Read the corrected record and its qualifications

  2. Anthropic: distinguish evaluator access from a general slowdown

    The pace anchor changed from -26 to 0, and its range from [-48, 5] to [-35, 45]. The company’s unilateral commitment in the cited essay is access for external evaluators. Its Responsible Scaling Policy describes development delays under specified conditions. The revised placement separates evaluator access from a general preference to slow development. The concern anchor remains 51. This is an editorial reassessment, not evidence that the company changed its position.

    Responsible Scaling Policy, version 3.4 · We Must Pace the Frontier

    Read the corrected record and its qualifications

Suggest a correction · Machine-readable log · Subscribe to the Atom feed